Flowers were buy one get one free at the store last week! You know what that means . . .
Remember this photo from my visit to Hollywood?
I liked that it was a kind of retro illustration of the famous intersection, but the image is definitely overexposed and the colors look more faded than they did in real life. I took the original photo in JPEG and not RAW so I had less flexibility in Lightroom, but I still think the result is an improvement on the original!
It’s not perfect, and I honestly just realized that it’s cropped differently than the original — oops! Guess I have more learning to do on how to use the export function
Have you ever gone back and edited old photos? Do you have any tips on working with JPEGs (or other non-RAW files) in an editing program?
I’ve started experimenting in Lightroom (my Lightroom 101 class started this week). So far I’ve only played with a few settings: white balance, temperature, tint, exposure, and contrast. I’m sure there will be plenty more fun tools to come!
Here’s one of my early attempts at enhancing an image:
And the original:
Which one do you prefer?
I’m not thrilled with my camera bag. I’ve got your builder basic, came free with the camera, boxy black camera bag. When it comes to having a place to stash my camera and lenses, it works. When it comes to how I want it to function in my life, it starts slipping.
I carried this bag when we visited Monticello. All my gear fits like puzzle pieces with little room to spare, so I was only able to carry a few extra essentials like cash and a few cards in my pockets. What happens when my outfit doesn’t have pockets? I don’t want to be carrying multiple bags. I also got a little concerned when trying to switch my lens. The strap kind of swivels where it meets the bag, and I was worried that it would flip over and dump out its contents when I was rummaging around in it. This is probably unlikely, but I don’t want to take a chance with all this expensive equipment!
So when we went to California, I tried using a large purse I’ve had for a while. It’s one of my go to travel bags because it’s deep and roomy so I can stash my wallet, a travel book, water bottles, etc. — all the goods I might want to carry around during a day of sightseeing. It’s not padded though, so I have to be VERY careful with it when I have my camera in there. The strap is also too short to be worn crossbody, which I would prefer when it gets heavy. I could just buy a padded insert to turn this purse into a camera bag, but I’ve had it long enough that I wouldn’t feel bad putting it into retirement and buying a new travel bag.
So I’ve been eyeing up a new camera bag. My priorities are:
1) Large enough to accommodate my DSLR, lenses, and a travel book with a little room to spare without looking huge
2) The option to wear it crossbody. Bonus points if the strap doesn’t look like an afterthought (unlike bags like the Missy and Mimi below that have shorter handles that can’t be removed).
3) Comfortable to carry around all day, so probably something less boxy
4) Cute! I can pretend this is for “security” so pickpockets don’t notice I’m carrying expensive equipment, but really I just like pretty things.
Below are some of the options I’ve considered. Most didn’t meet all my desired criteria. It’s been hardest to pick something that’s both large-ish and not boxy. (The following photos obviously do not belong to me – each image links back to the original source.)
But for now I think I’ve settled on the Gracie bag from Jo Totes.
It’s dimensions are pretty similar to the bag I carried in California so it should be able to fit all of my stuff, and I like all the extra pockets and that it isn’t too boxy. Jo Totes bags are slightly cheaper than the ones from Kelly Moore, but that wasn’t a deciding factor. I haven’t pulled the trigger yet — I don’t need it immediately and I’m hoping I’ll find a discount code somewhere — but all I need to decide on is whether I want mint or butterscotch? (It seems that someone at Jo Totes has a sweet tooth.)
Do you have a favorite camera bag that you can recommend?
After visiting Hollywood and Santa Monica, we finished up our trip to California with a quick stop in Beverly Hills. We spent an hour or so just wandering around Rodeo Drive before our dinner reservations that evening. (I took the time to enjoy the restaurant and so didn’t take any pics there, but it was enchanting! Il Cielo, google it. You won’t be sorry!)
Without further ado, Beverly Hills:
We weren’t quite ready to head back to the hotel after finishing our self-guided scavenger hunt/walking tour of Hollywood, so we hit up Santa Monica for dinner. I took advantage of the scenery for some more photo ops, naturally. I really think a lot of these images could benefit immensely from some editing to brighten them up and give them more of a golden quality. Perhaps I just feel more attuned to that lately since my Lightroom class is due to start in a few days.
I won’t weigh the photos down with any commentary. As always, please leave a comment if you see something you would have done differently!
I recently had the chance to take a quick trip to California! There was some personal business that took me there, but we were still able to squeeze in a bit of sightseeing in our free time.
It was challenging to capture what I felt were “good” pictures (particularly in composition) given the limitations of things like crowds and traffic. I was getting spoiled by shooting still lifes under controlled conditions back home! Also to my shame, I temporarily forgot about changing ISO and was fighting camera shake during unnecessarily long shutter speeds in dim areas. Oops. I came to my senses later in the day, but I’m glad most of the sights were out in the sun. For the record, I had my camera set on aperture priority mode so as not to slow us down too much, but I made adjustments here and there.
Without further ado, here is a small sampling of my photos of Hollywood:
We got off the metro at Hollywood & Vine to find a very Hollywood-themed station. This shot is of the ceiling. There were film strip and camera motifs all over the place.
I learned that I can’t rely on the screen on the back of my camera to verify that a photo came out 😦 This next image is much darker than I thought it would be. This would probably be an easy fix in an editing program once I learn how to use one.
The first Emmy Awards were hosted at the Hollywood Athletic Club which is not currently occupied. We peeked in the windows and it looked beautiful inside! The room we could see had kind of a Spanish revival feel. I hope someone leases it and gives it some love soon!
Entering the lobby of the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel. This was the site of the first Academy Awards and is reportedly haunted by Marilyn Monroe, among others. This is where I FINALLY remembered about changing my ISO. DUH.
And finally, the pièce de résistance:
Does anyone have any tips for taking better photos out in the real world? I’m always looking for constructive criticism, so leave a comment! I know a lot of the small things that bother me can probably be fixed in post-processing. All of these images are SOOC, but I’m looking forward to the Lightroom class I’m taking next month!